Search found 1868 matches
- 2024 May 22, 09:52
- Forum: Moates Support
- Topic: Moates Quarterhorse corrupting tunes - How I solved it!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 35
Re: Moates Quarterhorse corrupting tunes - How I solved it!
I have a whole bunch of quarterhorse's I could have shipped you if you needed one. They are $350 +actual shipping. I ship all over the world so no worries there.
- 2024 May 22, 08:45
- Forum: Additional Support
- Topic: SCT X2
- Replies: 1
- Views: 36
Re: SCT X2
as long as the x2 physically works it shouldn't be a problem
if you have a copy of the old sct updater to load the file please do post it, others were asking about it since sct no longer supports it or has it for download
I don't tune any aftermarket ecu's remotely, I do those in house as they usually always require some finesse and verification.
if you have a copy of the old sct updater to load the file please do post it, others were asking about it since sct no longer supports it or has it for download
I don't tune any aftermarket ecu's remotely, I do those in house as they usually always require some finesse and verification.
- 2024 May 21, 16:11
- Forum: CBAZA - 94/95 Mustang V8 ECUs
- Topic: U4PO swap on Bronco II.. Is Evap solenoid needed?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 127
Re: U4PO swap on Bronco II.. Is Evap solenoid needed?
im not sure how the evap functions on the bronco 2
if theres no purge solenoid then how is the ecu controlling it?
if theres no purge solenoid then how is the ecu controlling it?
- 2024 May 21, 16:09
- Forum: Hardware, Programming & Disassembly
- Topic: Foxbody EEC-V
- Replies: 3
- Views: 98
Re: Foxbody EEC-V
Yeah the 94/95 auto mustang v8 ecu would be much easier and faster to find and swap out. Only would require replacing the tcc solenoid on the valve body with a 1 ohm tcc for a 94-95 mustang v8. Its one retaining bolt that holds it in takes all of 2 seconds to unplug and plug the other in once you drop the trans pan.
but yeah otherwise if going the eec-v route the 96 ecu would be your only option. It would require a custom tune and premium membership though as not enough of it is broken out publicly.
but yeah otherwise if going the eec-v route the 96 ecu would be your only option. It would require a custom tune and premium membership though as not enough of it is broken out publicly.
- 2024 May 02, 20:02
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: 5.8L Belt Tensioner
- Replies: 3
- Views: 752
Re: 5.8L Belt Tensioner
Is a dorman or the like oem replacement from autozone no good?
- 2024 May 02, 14:54
- Forum: FBGI0 - 02-04 Mustangs (ALL)
- Topic: Base Idle Reset
- Replies: 2
- Views: 864
- 2024 Apr 30, 20:14
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: MPG Mode + EGR = Excessive Timing
- Replies: 2
- Views: 953
Re: MPG Mode + EGR = Excessive Timing
You dont need to add any timing
- 2024 Apr 30, 10:26
- Forum: A1C - 80/90s EFI-SD4x Speed Density
- Topic: Dyno scheduled, can you lock up converter in drive via tune
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2695
Re: Dyno scheduled, can you lock up converter in drive via tune
yep
its tprel and vehicle speed for lockup
its tprel and vehicle speed for lockup
- 2024 Apr 29, 11:13
- Forum: PCM / ECU / EEC Tuning
- Topic: Datalog viewer recommendations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3414
Re: Datalog viewer recommendations
Im curious, what is the benefit to being able to graph it and compare etc...
what are you trying to do exactly?
what are you trying to do exactly?
- 2024 Apr 27, 10:50
- Forum: The Range
- Topic: Dont use Duckduckgo browser.. Brave recommended
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4212
Dont use Duckduckgo browser.. Brave recommended
Ive always had low bandwidth and disconnect issues with the forum since inception, its something Ive lived with but it forced me to throw every trick in the book at the forum to get it as fast as possible. Over the years its gotten slightly worse so Ive just thrown more bandwidth at the problem and just accepted it. Every test Ive ran showed our website and forum runs circles around every other forum and website I know of and for reasons I just couldnt find Ive been forced to just concluded it was what it was meaning I had no clue what bottle necked it so bad.
With the forum upgrade and duckduckgo no longer being supported I had to use the Brave browser which Ive had on my mobile for years but just never used.
First impression was that the forum hauls ass. I attributed it to the updated phpbb but when I went to view some things with ddg I was once again bottlenecked.
So figured Id do some testing and the results are just mind blowing theres absolutely no comparison. For the test I opened 100 threads simultaneously.
Using duckduckgo it took 39 minutes to completely load them all after all the disconnects finally resolved. This is the norm that Ive been experiencing for years.
The same 100 threads loaded in just 11 seconds using brave +/- 2 seconds since I was so taken back that I couldnt believe what I just witnessed.
So for anyone else that has low speed issues or frequent disconnects first check your browser. Probably didnt help that I use duckduckslow on everything but never again.
With the forum upgrade and duckduckgo no longer being supported I had to use the Brave browser which Ive had on my mobile for years but just never used.
First impression was that the forum hauls ass. I attributed it to the updated phpbb but when I went to view some things with ddg I was once again bottlenecked.
So figured Id do some testing and the results are just mind blowing theres absolutely no comparison. For the test I opened 100 threads simultaneously.
Using duckduckgo it took 39 minutes to completely load them all after all the disconnects finally resolved. This is the norm that Ive been experiencing for years.
The same 100 threads loaded in just 11 seconds using brave +/- 2 seconds since I was so taken back that I couldnt believe what I just witnessed.
So for anyone else that has low speed issues or frequent disconnects first check your browser. Probably didnt help that I use duckduckslow on everything but never again.